Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format

James E. LaBarre (jamesl@nrt.net)
Wed, 26 Mar 1997 09:41:29 -0500


Message-ID: <01BC39C9.E2EE2980@jamesl.nrt.net>
From: "James E. LaBarre" <jamesl@nrt.net>
To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
Subject: RE: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 09:41:29 -0500

On the subject of Amaya, what is the sattus of porting it to Windows 95? =
 (It'll be a while before I can get back to fiddling with my Linux =
setup, for which I'll have to install something like Lesstif anyway).  =
While I'm stuck with the accursed OS for now, I'd like to try out Amaya

----------
From: 	Stephanos Piperoglou[SMTP:spip@hol.gr]
Sent: 	Wednesday, March 26, 1997 8:57 AM
To: 	Jukka Korpela
Cc: 	www-html@w3.org
Subject: 	Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format

On Tue, 25 Mar 1997, Jukka Korpela wrote:

> I could even imagine a program which would allow the user manage =
_both_
> the structure and some particular presentation of a document, without
> mixing the two. It would, perhaps, allow me to save the document as
> a pair of an HTML file and a style sheet file. Well, I have to stop
> dreaming. (By first encounter with Office 97 suggested to me that
> it has a different approach, to put it mildly.)

Try Amaya. That's exactly what it does.