Re: Source code [was: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format]

Paul Prescod (papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca)
Tue, 25 Mar 1997 06:56:54 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jukka Korpela: "Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format"
Previous message: Jukka Korpela: "Re: "Mailto" Command"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Connolly: "Source code [was: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format]"

Message-ID: <3337BD86.5D8A@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 06:56:54 -0500
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
To: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Source code [was: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format]

Dan Connolly wrote:
> But lest folks should get the wrong impression, CSS implementations
> are available in source code as well:

Thanks Dan, I wasn't sure if those products were "tracking" the CSS
stanadrd as it evolves. I'm not priviledged to run on one of the
platforms that is supported.

 Paul Prescod

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jukka Korpela: "Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format"
Previous message: Jukka Korpela: "Re: "Mailto" Command"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Connolly: "Source code [was: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format]"