Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 01:33:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199703090633.BAA06670@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> From: "nemo/Joel N. Weber II" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com CC: firstname.lastname@example.org In-reply-to: <199703080325.TAA29293@server.livingston.com> (message from Subject: Re: Any hope of an interim spec? Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 19:25:39 -0800 (PST) From: MegaZone <email@example.com> Organization: WPI Discordian Society, Undocumented Cabal of the Accursed Saint Shiranto Joe It shouldn't take much to roll in these known tags/attributes into 3.2 and issue it as an interim spec. 3.2 will be there for those who want to be 'safe' with established systems, and '3.3' would be for those who want to start using new things yet ensure validity. I won't even argue for new tags lige BGCOLOR on TD|TH, etc. Just something that collates these seperate standards into something usable we can point to and check our work against. All you're really asking for is repackaging. Browser writers have a lot of trouble tracking down all the specs they need to implement, in my experience; but we can easily find those few specs you mention. I think what you're really looking for is a DTD that you can validate against, right? Can you use HTML Pro? Or is there something else I'm missing?