Re: Is BGCOLOR deprecated?

Neil St.Laurent (neil@bigpic.com)
Wed, 30 Jul 1997 11:11:41 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Paul Prescod: "Re: HTML 4.0/SGML, (#PCDATA)* problem in TEXTAREA"
Previous message: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor: "Re: Body start tag. (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: eva: "Is BGCOLOR deprecated?"

Message-Id: <199707301707.LAA00433@underworld.bigpic.com>
From: "Neil St.Laurent" <neil@bigpic.com>
To: roconnor@uwaterloo.ca
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 11:11:41 -0600
Subject: Re: Is BGCOLOR deprecated?
CC: www-html@w3.org

In the time of 30 Jul 97:12:34, www-html@w3.org pronounced:

> Why does the DTD have to be simple?

A simplified DTD would make it easier for implementors to start 
experimenting with XML based documents.  Such that removing marked 
sections makes the parsing/processing quite a bit simpler -- in 
somebody's mind at least.

Actually it's nice to see the marked deprecated section be gone.
__
| Mortar: Advanced Web Development <http://bigpic.com/mortar/>
| Neil St.Laurent  neil@bigpic.com
| Big Picture Multimedia

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Paul Prescod: "Re: HTML 4.0/SGML, (#PCDATA)* problem in TEXTAREA"
Previous message: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor: "Re: Body start tag. (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: eva: "Is BGCOLOR deprecated?"