Re: Definition lists

Jordan Reiter (jreiter@mail.slc.edu)
Wed, 30 Jul 1997 03:19:49 -0500


Message-Id: <l03110703b004a9359ade@[198.77.183.209]>
In-Reply-To: <199707300024.AA02146@jupiter.ph-cip.Uni-Koeln.DE>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 03:19:49 -0500
To: wahlen@ph-cip.Uni-Koeln.DE (Holger Wahlen), www-html@w3.org
From: Jordan Reiter <jreiter@mail.slc.edu>
Subject: Re: Definition lists

At 7:24 PM -0500 07-29-1997, Holger Wahlen wrote:

>	(1) (DT+, DD)+
>(multiple DTs are allowed, multiple DDs aren't, plus the
>restrictions given above) and
>	(2) (DT+, DD+)+
Heck, why not:
	(3) (DT, DD)+
?  What makes DT's so darn special that they can be repeated here and there
like there's no tomorrow?  In almost every occasion that I've used DL's,
I've needed at least as many DD's as DT's, if not more.

--------------------------------------------------------
[                    Jordan Reiter                     ]
[            mailto:jreiter@mail.slc.edu               ]
[ "You can't just say, 'I don't want to get involved.' ]
[  The universe got you involved."  --Hal Lipset, P.I. ]
--------------------------------------------------------