Re: Definition lists

Rob (wlkngowl@unix.asb.com)
Mon, 28 Jul 1997 12:15:53 -0500


Message-Id: <199707281628.MAA19621@unix.asb.com>
From: "Rob" <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 12:15:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Definition lists
CC: www-html@w3.org

On Mon, 28 Jul 1997 Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
> [..]
> I am sympathetic to the stricter model (DT+, DD)+ and would
> like to hear arguments as to why this would be a bad idea.

I see nothing wrong with (DT, DD+) instead. To me this makes more 
sense than multiple DT elements, since (logically) a term can have 
multiple definitions.

Rob
---
Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl (wlkngowl@unix.asb.com)
Se habla PGP.
http://www.asb.com/usr/wlkngowl