Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 07:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707181438.HAA17729@iceland.it.earthlink.net> To: email@example.com From: Shelley Powers <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: BUTTON element If the HTML working group is working towards a more stable release, then every new element entered into every new release should be questioned and re-questioned as to the advisability of inclusion. Those who submit the extension should prove there is no other approach to take to accomplish the same effect. You will never have a stable release if you keep adding in elements that are "handy". With the BUTTON element, I am reading of a block-level element that surrounds the block with a button-like effect (pressing button reverses highlight pattern, giving the appearance of a clicked button). There are also three types of actions associated with it: submit, which will submit enclosing form, reset, which resets enclosing form, and button which triggers associated script. If border-width, -style, -color can be applied to a DIV block, why not add two new styles: button-down and button-up. Then, mousedown and mouseup, which will be defined in DOM, can change the style or the class of the block to reflect the mouse down and up actions. A mouseup event can also do whatever the web page developer wants the block to do, no built-in limits. If the DOM group provides a specification that enables us to classify objects for event trapping, then we can define our own class of "button", which uses CSS1 for appearance, and DOM for event handling, and only have to code behavior we want once, and apply many times. In other words, does BUTTON add something new that can only be handled within HTML, and not within DOM or CSS1 or event ECMAScript. You tell me. Shelley ============================================================= Shelley Powers YASD email@example.com http://www.yasd.com http://www.dynamicearth.com IDG Books Professional Series book on Dynamic HTML, authored by Shelley Powers. Out early Fall.