Re: Collapsing breaks & non-beaking spaces.

Liam Quinn wrote:
> We've established that there is no use for multiple non-breaking
spaces 
> except as a presentation hack, so why not define the non-breaking
space as 
> collapsible?  The other alternatives are to define it as
non-collapsible, 
> which would give justification to the abuse...

Hear ye, hear ye! The Righteous Order of Moral Markup calls for a
universal ban on abusive use of non-breaking spaces. Heathen sinners
who have used this presentation hack will burn when their obscene
markup is rendered impotent by the diktats of the vengeful pure!

Of course, we'll have get the evil empires of the web (foul supporters
of unclean practices!) to buy into this crusade to piss off some of
their customers. (~:

David Perrell

Received on Monday, 14 July 1997 02:50:49 UTC