Re: Some complaints about HTML 4.0

Arnoud (
Sun, 13 Jul 1997 15:09:25 +0200

From: (Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet)
Subject: Re: Some complaints about HTML 4.0
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 15:09:25 +0200
Message-ID: <>

In article <>,
"David Perrell" <> wrote:
> No, for the same reason as &nbsp;. HTML should not be an exercise in
> pedantry. Choose the interpretation that provides the most power of
> expression. Do not actively limit presentational possibilities for the
> sake of structural Puritanism.

The problem right now is that you as an author simply *do not know*
whether <BR><BR> or &nbsp;&nbsp; will collapse or not. This makes
it next to impossible to use it "properly", because you may very
well be using an undocumented feature or error recovery side-effect.
If the spec said "<BR><BR> collapses" or "&nbsp; is not a space,
it just looks like one", then you could rely on this behaviour.

E-mail: .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665
Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <>