Re: Some complaints about HTML 4.0

Arnoud (galactus@htmlhelp.com)
Sat, 12 Jul 1997 23:03:02 +0200


From: galactus@htmlhelp.com (Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet)
To: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Some complaints about HTML 4.0
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 23:03:02 +0200
Message-ID: <GE/xz4uYOVab089yn@htmlhelp.com>

In article <v03102854afed817f7039@[205.149.180.135]>,
Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com> wrote:
> At 7:15p +0200 07/12/97, Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet wrote:
>  > 2. There is definite statement on &nbsp;&nbsp; being collapsing or not.
> 
> Did you leave out a word between "is" and "definite"? :)

Eh. Oops? :-) This sentence should have read
"There is no definite statement on &nbsp;&nbsp; being collapsing or not."
because there is nothing in either HTML 2.0 or 3.2 that states whether
this character is whitespace wrt collapsing or not.

-- 
E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665
Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/>