Re: Deprecation in HTML 4.0

Chapman, Hass (hass.chapman@sebank.se)
Fri, 11 Jul 1997 08:16 +0200


Message-Id: <199707110620.IAA21943@se2000.sebank.se>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 08:16 +0200
From: hass.chapman@sebank.se (Chapman, Hass)
To: roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca, www-html@w3.org
Subject: RE: Deprecation in HTML 4.0


 ----------
>From: "Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor" (reply to:=20
>roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca)
>This sounds like very good reasoning to me, but I get the impression that
>some elements are not being deprecated because they are ``popular''.
>(e.g. IMG, B, I, TT, <A NAME=3D"foo">)  This seems like a very silly reason
>not to deprecate elements (or attributes).  The specs wouldn't force
>authors not to use theses elements.  It is a suggestion.  I think most
>people here would agree that the above list of elements (and attributes)
>shouldn't be used in pure HTML 4.0. (HTML 4.0 strict?)

Why shouldn't IMG be used?

 ----------------------------------------------
}:-o
Regards
/Hass
 ----------------------------------------------
08 - 63 93 644 (Work)
08 - 99 74 39 (Home)
070 - 66 46 180 (Mobile)

http://hass.home.ml.org
hass@bigfoot.com
 ----------------------------------------------

"I may not agree with what you say but I will
fight until I die for your right to say it."
 - Voltaire (A very clever man)