Re: HTML 4.0 draft available

• From: Scott Matthewman <scottm@danielson.co.uk>
• Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 16:05:38 +0100
• To: "Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor" <roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca>
• Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <19970710150924434.AAA278@scott.danielson.co.uk>

> To support <FILENAME> new browsers will have to be made.  To support CSS,
> nw browers have to be made.  It would be pointless to create a <FILENAME>
> element because if browers supported this, then they would also support
> <SPAN CLASS=Filename>, which is a better solution.

To support HTML 4.0 new browsers will have to be made.
Let's all go home now ;-)

A FILENAME element fits the model in that it's contextual; I guess it has
extra subtleties compared to, say, SAMP. Sounds OK to me...

Received on Thursday, 10 July 1997 11:06:33 UTC