Re: HTML 4.0 draft available

Scott Matthewman (scottm@danielson.co.uk)
Thu, 10 Jul 1997 16:05:38 +0100


From: scottm@danielson.co.uk (Scott Matthewman)
To: "Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor" <roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
Subject: Re: HTML 4.0 draft available
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 16:05:38 +0100
Message-ID: <19970710150924434.AAA278@scott.danielson.co.uk>

> To support <FILENAME> new browsers will have to be made.  To support CSS,
> nw browers have to be made.  It would be pointless to create a <FILENAME>
> element because if browers supported this, then they would also support
> <SPAN CLASS=Filename>, which is a better solution.

To support HTML 4.0 new browsers will have to be made.
Let's all go home now ;-)

A FILENAME element fits the model in that it's contextual; I guess it has
extra subtleties compared to, say, SAMP. Sounds OK to me...