- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 03 Feb 1997 23:58:36 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
No, it is an HTML issue too. Those tags are not legitimate for TD with 3.2 nor Cougar. Both of which are either experimental or backward-looking. Neither can in any way be considered usable for serious HTMLbrewers. 3.0 had some nice things, it also had stuff I think was stupid. I don't consider 3.0 atall valid - and since neither does the W3C nor any major browser maker, it doesn't make sense to. Then you are quite wrong. HTML3 was a perfectly valid DTD, and large chunks of it are incorporated in Cougar Just because you don't like it doesn't make it invalid: as is obvious, I think 3.2 and Cougar suck little black toads. But they're perfectly valid DTDs. ///Peter
Received on Monday, 3 February 1997 18:58:46 UTC