Re: Comments on HTMl 4 draft (9/Nov/1997)

Jordan Reiter (jreiter@mail.slc.edu)
Wed, 17 Dec 1997 20:19:26 -0500


Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 20:19:26 -0500
Message-Id: <l03110701b0bde51e9e5b@[192.168.1.130]>
In-Reply-To: <01bd0b32$9fecab80$LocalHost@hpxu>
To: Ian Hickson <exxieh@bath.ac.uk>
From: Jordan Reiter <jreiter@mail.slc.edu>
Cc: neil@bigpic.com, www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comments on HTMl 4 draft (9/Nov/1997)

=7FIan Hickson felt an urge to reveal at 9:27 PM -0000 on 12/17/97:
> But my point is why isn't it deprecated while <S> and <STRIKE> are? They
> fall under the same category and in fact TT has more elements already copi=
ng
> with "screen output" and similar things! (eg, <CODE>, <KBD>, <SAMP>)

And, if you think about it, <STRIKE> is really the only widely implemented
way to indicate what is going to be covered by <DEL>. I personally believe
that <STRIKE> did in fact have a logical basis (the idea being that this is
text that was *struck*, hence strike-through), rather than a purely
presentational one. Since EM and STRONG have long been available as
alternatives to I and EM, it does cause one to wonder why they were so
eager to <STRIKE>STRIKE</STRIKE> :)

-------------------------------------------------------
[           Jordan Reiter                             ]
[           mailto:jreiter@mail.slc.edu               ]
[  "It's well known that dead people are all sick     ]
[   because they're too depressing."                  ]
[   -- from http://www.icemcfd.com/cgi-bin/make_flame ]
-------------------------------------------------------