Re: why TITLE, not TITLE?

Peter Flynn (pflynn@imbolc.ucc.ie)
11 Aug 1997 12:31:06 +0100


Date: 11 Aug 1997 12:31:06 +0100
From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@imbolc.ucc.ie>
To: papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Message-id: <199708111131.MAA21033@imbolc.ucc.ie>
Subject: Re: why TITLE, not TITLE?

Paul Prescod writes:
> HTML 2.0 was the first HTML described as a DTD. Everything before was
> just described in prose (and AFAIK didn't have explicit version
> numbers).

Not quite: there was a draft HTML DTD long before it ever acquired "2.0"
I was the person who kept bugging Dan and Tim because the version
posted on CERN's FTP server was accidentally broken and wouldn't parse.

///Peter