Re: META question...

Steven Champeon (schampeo@hesketh.com)
Fri, 18 Apr 1997 02:17:02 -0400


Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970418021702.0077b6d0@mail.imvi.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 02:17:02 -0400
To: galactus@htmlhelp.com (Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet), www-html@w3.org
From: Steven Champeon <schampeo@hesketh.com>
Subject: Re: META question...
In-Reply-To: <32oVz4uYOtvO089yn@htmlhelp.com>

At 10:53 PM 4/17/97 +0200, Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet graced us with:
> In article <3.0.32.19970416111435.00949680@central.cnet.com>,
> Josh Paluch <joshp@cnet.com> wrote:
> > Disregarding whether it should or should not be in the header...
> > Will it *work* in the <body>?
> 
> You're asking us to define the behaviour of undefined behaviour.
> I believe the proper response is "Moo".

Or "mu", depending on the context.

Steve


--
Steven Champeon                 |    Negative forces have value.
http://www.hesketh.com/schampeo |          - Henry Adams