Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 00:48:38 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199704060548.AAA21566@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> From: "nemo/Joel N. Weber II" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com CC: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com In-reply-to: <333AF0A6.75EF8A3F@w3.org> (message from Dan Connolly on Thu, 27 Subject: Re: HTML "include": see WD-object [was: HTTP Connection Management] [This message was sent to the http-wg list; but it seems to be an html issue, so I'm replying on the www-html list.] From: Dan Connolly <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 16:11:50 -0600 Organization: World Wide Web Consortium John Franks wrote: > One of the major failings of HTML is its inability to do > "client side includes" i.e. the equivalent of <img src="foo.png"> > for text rather than images. We expect to remedy this with deployment support for the <object> spec. For example: <object data="foo.html"> <a href="foo.html">would be in-line if your client supported WD-object</a> </object>  http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-object From reading that spec, I'm not clear whether foo.html is supposed to be a complete HTML document (ie with a <HEAD> and <BODY>), or if the HTML in foo.html is supposed be included the way a #include directive in C works. Am I missing something?