- From: Sunil Mishra <smishra@cc.gatech.edu>
- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 17:34:45 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
\\ Perhaps this is a problem of me not yet being clear on the precise \\ meanings of SMGL terms, but isn't it now two for HTML: \\ \\ <!-- \\ \\ and: \\ <!DOCTYPE True, but DOCTYPE can only go at the start of the SGML document. It's an open question if that puts it in the category of being legal *within* HTML. \\ Also, wouldn't a real SGML parser handle comments in a DOCTYPE \\ declaration, but they are presently excluded, or at perhaps "disrecommended", \\ there for HTML? They are? I didn't know that. I had simply assumed that a "true" HTML parser would be able to handle things that are legal within the DOCTYPE. Sunil
Received on Sunday, 22 September 1996 17:34:58 UTC