Re: Extended URL for frames

Walter Ian Kaye (boo@best.com)
Sun, 12 Sep 1976 16:24:25 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Frank Naranjo: "Re: HTML code"
Previous message: Walter Ian Kaye: "Re: New CSS1 draft available"
In reply to: David Perrell: "Extended URL for frames"
Next in thread: Arnoud : "Re: Extended URL for frames"

Message-Id: <v0300780588bfadca0d18@[205.149.180.135]>
In-Reply-To: <199609120154.SAA02538@cyprus.it.earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1976 16:24:25 -0700
To: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
From: Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>
Subject: Re: Extended URL for frames

At 6:50p -0700 09/11/96, David Perrell wrote:
[snip]
Looks pretty good to me.

>There is some question as to whether URLs are 'intended' to reproduce
>state. Executables and server-side scripts can reproduce particular
>states via arguments appended to their URLs, and I've heard no
>complaint that this is bad behavior.

I'm now beginning to wonder: What is the maximum length of a URL?

__________________________________________________________________________
    Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>     Programmer - Excel, AppleScript,
          Mountain View, CA                         ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML
 http://www.natural-innovations.com/     Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Frank Naranjo: "Re: HTML code"
Previous message: Walter Ian Kaye: "Re: New CSS1 draft available"
In reply to: David Perrell: "Extended URL for frames"
Next in thread: Arnoud : "Re: Extended URL for frames"