Re: <resouce>, links, and addresses [was: W3C and Handle technology ]

Arnoud (galactus@htmlhelp.com)
Tue, 10 Sep 1996 20:55:50 +0200


From: galactus@htmlhelp.com (Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet)
To: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: <resouce>, links, and addresses [was: W3C and Handle technology ]
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 20:55:50 +0200
Message-ID: <2mbNy4uYOp5N089yn@htmlhelp.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <9609091058.ZM26707@gaia.ckm.ucsf.edu>,
"Marc Salomon" <marc@ckm.ucsf.edu> wrote:
> But potential namespace collisions aside, are ID and NAME to be equivalent ways
> of expressing an anchor tail in HTML addressable with the fragment/anchor ID
> after the # in the URL?

Yes; ID is just a more generic way of handling this than NAME. You
can attach it to any element, so you don't have to kludge things like

<P>
<A NAME="par1">The</A> foozlebib is actually...

Galactus

- -- 
E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665
Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/>


-----END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----