Re: <IMAGE>? <TT> == <I>? toHell(NS)

Drazen Kacar (Drazen.Kacar@public.srce.hr)
Tue, 29 Oct 1996 08:09:11 +0100 (MET)


From: Drazen.Kacar@public.srce.hr (Drazen Kacar)
Message-Id: <199610290709.IAA20212@jagor.srce.hr>
Subject: Re: <IMAGE>? <TT> == <I>? toHell(NS)
In-Reply-To: <199610290533.VAA23462@spain.it.earthlink.net> from David Perrell at "Oct 28, 96 09:26:16 pm"
To: davidp@earthlink.net (David Perrell)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 08:09:11 +0100 (MET)
Cc: preece@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com, www-html@w3.org

David Perrell wrote:
> 
> None, IMO. So far as I know, TT and I are not accumulative. The second
> <TT> is like turning on a switch that's already on -- no change.
> Likewise, </I> is the off switch for italic. If it's already off,
> ignore it.

Hmmm... You can have italics on via style sheet and if </I> is a valid way
to turn it off than some people will have minor problems with expressing
this in DTD, I think. :)

-- 
Life is a sexually transmitted disease.

dave@fly.cc.fer.hr
dave@zemris.fer.hr