Re: <IMAGE>?

Peter Flynn (pflynn@curia.ucc.ie)
25 Oct 1996 00:42:34 +0100


Date: 25 Oct 1996 00:42:34 +0100
From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
Subject: Re: <IMAGE>?
In-reply-to: <199610242044.NAA11620@norway.it.earthlink.net> (message from
To: davidp@earthlink.net
Cc: CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil, www-html@w3.org
Message-id: <199610242342.AAA04877@curia.ucc.ie>

   Charles Peyton Taylor wrote:
   > I've noticed that Netscape honors an <IMAGE> tag, like <IMG>
   > 
   > Where did this tag come from?

   Netscapers can be a bit hasty and don't always think things through.
   Maybe they stop parsing after <IM.

   This is going to cause problems when they finally get around to
   spawning the <IMMATERIAL> tag.

Heh. I tried IMAGINARY but it failed. IMAGE is quite a good way to
show Nutscope users a picture no-one else can see, though :-)

///Peter