- From: James Aylett <sja20@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 10:08:58 +0100 (BST)
- To: Carl Morris <msftrncs@htcnet.com>
- cc: WWW HTML List <www-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, Carl Morris wrote:
> BUT read the spec, not the DTD! Yuo will read that it implies that at
> least browsers should probably expect the end tag to be missing ...
> maybe in lue of the 3.0 DTD?
Ooh, I've gone all cautious now. Am I right in saying that the spec _is_
the DTD (being a markup language and all)? If not, then the spec has got
to be infinitely big, surely, to deal with browser types that don't yet
exist yet (rendering into a hologram, for instance).
James
--
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------\
James Aylett - Crystal Services (crystal.clare.cam.ac.uk): BBS, Ftp and Web
Clare College, Cambridge, CB2 1TL -- sja20@cam.ac.uk -- (0976) 212023
Received on Friday, 4 October 1996 05:10:27 UTC