- From: Arnoud <galactus@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 20:22:00 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.961118232104.29200A-100000@fizzgig.glasswings.com.au>, Stuart Young <nakor@glasswings.com.au> wrote: > Mebbe someone should put <LINK> in as a revamped HTML 3.2 command (so the > vendors actually start using it rather than just ignoring it all the time!) Huh? The LINK element *is* part of the HTML 3.2 "PR" draft available from W3C at this moment. It even states "This element is not widely supported" right there. Galactus - -- E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665 Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/> -----END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Received on Sunday, 17 November 1996 14:57:35 UTC