From: Christian Taube <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <199606130717.JAA14452@gauss.isa.de> Subject: Re: <FONT> <FONT> <FONT> To: email@example.com (Ka-Ping Yee) Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 09:17:09 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org In-Reply-To: <31BEF355.318BC78A@sse.tottori-u.ac.jp> from "Ka-Ping Yee" at Jun 13, 96 01:41:57 am Ka-Ping Yee wrote: ]The new W3C toplevel page looks pretty, but it's a ]shame to see all that rampant <FONT>ing all over it. ] ]http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/ Hm, but at least there's a <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> in it, and in HTML 3.2 the <BIG>, <FONT> and-so-on-stuff is completely legal... See also http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Wilbur/HTML3.2.dtd for the SGML-aware out there. Actually, what the DTD says about font-level formatting is IMHO relatively nifty as far as HTML goes ;-). But then again, <FONT> is of course a bow to Netscape. Christian. -- Christian Taube -- <A HREF="http://www.isa.de/~taube">email@example.com</A> PGP public key available. Any opinions expressed are mine! Thought for today: Time is hard, like a tractor beam with computers, channels and impatience.