Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG

Walter Ian Kaye (boo@best.com)
Mon, 3 Jun 1996 08:57:05 -0700


Message-Id: <v03006f09add8ba69b42a@[205.149.180.135]>
In-Reply-To: <31B2E31F.7445BEF9@mars.ic.iaf.nl>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 08:57:05 -0700
To: www-html@w3.org
From: Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>
Subject: Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG

At 3:05p +0200 06/03/96, Abigail wrote:
>Benjamin Franz wrote:
>>
>[ About allowing <ING> inside <PRE> ]
>
>> The whole issue is rapidly becoming irrelevant anyway since the use of
>> images in PRE is a hack to work around the lack of deployed tables - a
>> situation that has all but disappeared now as even AOL is rolling out a
>> table capable browser - leaving Lynx as the only browser with any
>> significant share that _cannot_ do tables. Tables are *much* superior
>> in achieving page layout control in general.
>
>TeX and PostScript are even better.


But they require separate, huge programs (seen Ghostscript or Acrobat?)
for rendering. Having this in HTML saves a lot of overhead and time,
and is inline. What I do on my "Directory of Files" page would be quite
ridiculous to do in PDF!


-Walter

__________________________________________________________________________
    Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>     Programmer - Excel, AppleScript,
          Mountain View, CA                         ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML
 http://www.natural-innovations.com/     Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter