Pining for freedom... [was: a good idea (fwd) ]

Daniel W. Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Tue, 16 Jul 1996 02:13:32 -0400


Message-Id: <199607160613.CAA06955@anansi.w3.org>
To: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Pining for freedom... [was: a good idea (fwd) ]
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Jul 1996 19:27:45 MST."
             <199607160227.TAA28866@server.livingston.com> 
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 02:13:32 -0400
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>

In message <199607160227.TAA28866@server.livingston.com>, MegaZone writes:
> 'Nearly all' is not
>acceptable, we should be looking for 'all compliant' browsers.  If a browser
>decided to do something outside of the standard, that should not be the
>concern of those setting the next standard.

Would that it were so...

Dan