Re: Parsing methods -Reply

Daniel W. Connolly (connolly@beach.w3.org)
Wed, 10 Jul 1996 17:46:44 -0400


Message-Id: <m0ue75o-0002URC@beach.w3.org>
To: Erik Aronesty <earonesty@montgomery.com>
cc: "'Jim Taylor'" <JHTaylor@videodiscovery.com>,
Subject: Re: Parsing methods -Reply 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jul 1996 13:20:49 MST."
             <c=US%a=_%p=Montgomery%l=EXCHANGE_SERVER-960710202049Z-26@sf-exch-2.montgomery.com> 
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 17:46:44 -0400
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@beach.w3.org>

In message <c=US%a=_%p=Montgomery%l=EXCHANGE_SERVER-960710202049Z-26@sf-exch-2.
montgomery.com>, Erik Aronesty writes:
>
>IE: should the parser see
>	<hello%^ myname=foo>
>as a TAG that was messed up........
>	OR
>as plain text?
>
>i say as a messed up tag.....

And you'd be right.

If you want to be sure, check with a validating SGML parser.
You can do this via the web using a validation service:

http://www.webtechs.com/html-val-svc/

sgmls: SGML error at -, line 7 at "%":
       Incorrect character in markup; markup terminated

Dan