Re: What about the OBJECT tag?

Thomas Reardon (thomasre@microsoft.com)
Fri, 5 Jul 1996 11:15:52 -0700


Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-76-MSG-960705181552Z-25040@tide21.microsoft.com>
From: Thomas Reardon <thomasre@microsoft.com>
To: "'Ka-Ping Yee'" <s-ping@orange.cv.tottori-u.ac.jp>
Cc: "'Dan Delaney'" <dgdela01@homer.louisville.edu>,
Subject: RE: What about the OBJECT tag?
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 1996 11:15:52 -0700

We'll add to IMG eventually, but not for IE3.  Only via OBJECT (which is
a logical replacement for IMG anyway).

>----------
>From: 	Ka-Ping Yee[SMTP:s-ping@orange.cv.tottori-u.ac.jp]
>Sent: 	Friday, July 05, 1996 11:12 AM
>To: 	Thomas Reardon
>Cc: 	'Dan Delaney'; 'www-html@w3.org'
>Subject: 	Re: What about the OBJECT tag?
>
>Thomas Reardon wrote:
>> 
>> For IE, also used to insert PNG images when we get around to shipping
>> the PNG ActiveX Control.
>
>PNG support at all is great -- but are there plans to make the
>browser itself understand PNG (in IMG tags, for instance)?  I
>think that would be a big step forward.  David Siegel would have
>so much free time ("a third of his life") he wouldn't know what
>to do with it...
>
>
>Ping
>