Re: Why no <IMG> inside <PRE>?

Stephen Turner (S.R.E.Turner@statslab.cam.ac.uk)
Wed, 10 Jan 1996 10:02:37 +0000 (GMT)


Message-Id: <m0tZxMb-000PrkC@lion.statslab.cam.ac.uk>
From: Stephen Turner <S.R.E.Turner@statslab.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Why no <IMG> inside <PRE>?
To: www-html@w3.org
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 10:02:37 +0000 (GMT)

A shorter kludge is <pre><tt><img></tt></pre>.

I agree with Abigail that there are good reasons to disallow it, though I
think images can be used fairly safely at the ends of <pre> lines.

-- 
Stephen R. E. Turner
  Stochastic Networks Group, Statistical Laboratory, University of Cambridge
  e-mail: sret1@cam.ac.uk  WWW: http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/home.html