Re: Why no <IMG> inside <PRE>?

Stephen Turner (
Wed, 10 Jan 1996 10:02:37 +0000 (GMT)

Message-Id: <>
From: Stephen Turner <>
Subject: Re: Why no <IMG> inside <PRE>?
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 10:02:37 +0000 (GMT)

A shorter kludge is <pre><tt><img></tt></pre>.

I agree with Abigail that there are good reasons to disallow it, though I
think images can be used fairly safely at the ends of <pre> lines.

Stephen R. E. Turner
  Stochastic Networks Group, Statistical Laboratory, University of Cambridge
  e-mail:  WWW: