Re: animation frenzy

Simone Demmel (neko@greenie.muc.de)
Wed, 18 Dec 1996 19:30:26 +0100 (MET)


Message-Id: <m0vaQl8-0008LkC@sleepy.greenie.muc.de>
From: neko@greenie.muc.de (Simone Demmel)
Subject: Re: animation frenzy
To: davidp@earthlink.net (David Perrell)
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 19:30:26 +0100 (MET)
Cc: innuendo@execpc.com, www-html@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <199612180450.UAA18660@cyprus.it.earthlink.net> from David Perrell at "Dec 17, 96 08:48:50 pm"

Hi,

David Perrell wrote:
> Easy. MSIE has more powerful layout tools than NSN. Style and flash
> aren't synonymous. Static pages can be laid out with dynamic placement.
> Flash can be a useful tool to gain attention, but overused it's an
> annoyance, and thereby defeats its intent.

And what does this help me, if I know only 50% of the internet can enjoy
my page? How about a 'back to the roots'? Only HTML2.0 or 3.2 - what about
3.2 (Wilbur? any news? Had it become an officoal standard now or is it
also left as a 'working draft'?)

neko
-- 
neko@greenie.muc.de 	  Simone Demmel		Muenchen (Germany)
Fax.: 089/354 59 80
http://greenie.muc.de/~neko/