Re: wherefore CGM?

Joel N. Weber II (nemo@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us)
Sat, 7 Dec 1996 18:11:20 -1000 (HST)


Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 18:11:20 -1000 (HST)
From: "Joel N. Weber II" <nemo@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>
To: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>
cc: www-html@w3.org, Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
Subject: Re: wherefore CGM?
In-Reply-To: <199612080335.TAA09979@iberia.it.earthlink.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.961207181001.4106A-100000@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>

On Sat, 7 Dec 1996, David Perrell wrote:

> > ... a 64-bit Unicode
> > to handle languages from extraterrestrials. :)
> 
> That reminds me of a couple of pages I found in a Unicode search:
> proposals for allocating Unicode sequences to Celtic Ogham and N.
> European Runes. Should be done, IMO.

The Linux kernel people had what is known as the `corporate zone'
which they decided would best be used for Klingon

nemo
                                                 http://www.cyclic.com/~nemo
<nemo@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>                    <devnull@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"...For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners."  -- Mathew 9:13