Re: Bug in htmlchek(.awk) on tables (</TR>)?
Owen Rees (rtor@ansa.co.uk)
Fri, 13 Oct 1995 10:01:14 +0100
Message-Id: <9510130901.AA09653@plato.ansa.co.uk>
To: mortenf@login.dknet.dk
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Bug in htmlchek(.awk) on tables (</TR>)?
In-Reply-To: Message from mortenf@login.dknet.dk of Fri, 13 Oct 1995
<OzcfwsZvIvkL084yn@login.dknet.dk>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 10:01:14 +0100
From: Owen Rees <rtor@ansa.co.uk>
mortenf@login.dknet.dk (Morten Frederiksen) writes:
> I realize that, and I do believe my problem isn't in that category.
> I do know how to write HTML (or so I thought), but one tends to doubt
> it when a respected validator doesn't agree on my markup.
The HALSoft HTML Validation service says it is good HTML 3 (but not
strict 3). Part of the problem here is to know which specification you
are, or should be, checking against. I tend to trust HAL over others
because it is driven directly from the DTDs.
Owen Rees
<rtor@ansa.co.uk>, <URL:http://www.ansa.co.uk/Staff/rtor.html>
Information about ANSA is at <URL:http://www.ansa.co.uk/>.