Re: Bug in htmlchek(.awk) on tables (</TR>)?

Owen Rees (rtor@ansa.co.uk)
Fri, 13 Oct 1995 10:01:14 +0100


Message-Id: <9510130901.AA09653@plato.ansa.co.uk>
To: mortenf@login.dknet.dk
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Bug in htmlchek(.awk) on tables (</TR>)? 
In-Reply-To: Message from mortenf@login.dknet.dk of Fri, 13 Oct 1995 
             <OzcfwsZvIvkL084yn@login.dknet.dk> 
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 10:01:14 +0100
From: Owen Rees <rtor@ansa.co.uk>

mortenf@login.dknet.dk (Morten Frederiksen) writes:
> I realize that, and I do believe my problem isn't in that category.
> I do know how to write HTML (or so I thought), but one tends to doubt
> it when a respected validator doesn't agree on my markup.

The HALSoft HTML Validation service says it is good HTML 3 (but not 
strict 3). Part of the problem here is to know which specification you 
are, or should be, checking against. I tend to trust HAL over others 
because it is driven directly from the DTDs.

Owen Rees
 <rtor@ansa.co.uk>, <URL:http://www.ansa.co.uk/Staff/rtor.html>
 Information about ANSA is at <URL:http://www.ansa.co.uk/>.