Re: assorted HTML and SGML questions

Joe Wells (
Sun, 19 Nov 1995 01:23:22 -0500

From: (Joe Wells)
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 01:23:22 -0500
Message-Id: <>
Subject: Re: assorted HTML and SGML questions
In-Reply-To: <>

>>>>> "lee" == <>
>>>>> "Dan" == Daniel W Connolly <>

    Joe> Q: (("text/html" Internet Media Type)) Does text/html forbid
    Joe> including the SGML declaration (<!SGML ...>)?  I know it forbids
    Joe> including a document type declaration subset, but the standard is
    Joe> unclear on whether the SGML declaration is allowed.

  Dan> No. In fact, it requires it...

  Dan> Well, you're the reader: if you say it's unclear, then it's unclear
  Dan> :-) Sorry.  But the info _is_ in there:

  Dan> ==================================================================
  Dan> HTML Public Text Identifiers

  Dan> To identify information as an HTML document conforming to this
  Dan> specification, each document must start with one of the following
  Dan> document type declarations.


  Dan> ...

I must be stupid, but I don't see the information in there.  Perhaps you
mean that "must start with ..." implies that there can be nothing before
the document type declaration.  Does that mean that the following is
illegal because the first thing is not a document type declaration?

  <!-- document type declaration on next line -- >
  <!doctype html public "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">

    Joe> Q: ((HTML and Empty P Elements)) What are the semantics of an
    Joe> empty P element in HTML?  The standard doesn't really seem to
    Joe> deal with this.

  lee> If by an empty P you mean <P></P> then what do you want the RFC to
  lee> say?

This is what I mean, except that it more commonly takes one of these



  <p><ul><li>text text<p><li>more text</ul>

Joe Wells <>