ACTION re: HTML 3: Too many tags!

Ka-Ping Yee (
Wed, 26 Jul 1995 04:32:01 -0400

Date: Wed, 26 Jul 1995 04:32:01 -0400
From: Ka-Ping Yee <>
Subject: ACTION re: HTML 3: Too many tags!
To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <>,,
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-Id: <>

A week ago, i wrote a message here lamenting the ridiculous proliferation
of easily-abusable tags[1, 2] in the proposed HTML 3.0 specification[3].

Aside from a discussion about whether <Q> actually has a distinct semantic
meaning then <BLOCKQUOTE>, responses generally agreed that most of the
other tags i mentioned were not necessary.  Specifically, they are:


The above tags are unnecessary for reasons explained in [4] and summarized
at the end of this message.

To me, they are simply unacceptable.  I would like to have them removed.

How can i go about accomplishing this (or finding adequate justification
for each and every one of them, which at the moment is sorely lacking)? 


Summary: why we don't need....
    CODE, KBD: redundant.  Use SAMP.
    AU: too specific.  apply attributes of all kinds to PERSON instead.
    ACRONYM, ABBREV: redundant.  Use DFN.
    INS, DEL: too specific.  apply attributes to P instead.
    S, U, BIG, SMALL: purely presentational markup.  doesn't belong in HTML.

and i still wonder about:
    Q: too specific.  are we going to mark up <PAREN>, <SENTENCE>, etc. also?

Ping (Ka-Ping Yee):  2B Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Canada | 62A Churchill St, Waterloo N2L 2X2, 519 886-3947
CWSF 89, 90, 92; LIYSF 90, 91; Shad Valley 92; DOE 93; IMO 91, 93; ACMIPC 94
:: Skuld :: Tendou Akane :: Belldandy :: Ayukawa Madoka :: Hayakawa Moemi ::
New! <> Yeah, i finally made a home page.