Re: Content-type and suggested file extensions for CSS

Mike Batchelor (mikebat@clark.net)
Tue, 25 Jul 1995 14:41:57 -0400 (EDT)


From: Mike Batchelor <mikebat@clark.net>
Message-Id: <199507251841.OAA17888@clark.net>
Subject: Re: Content-type and suggested file extensions for CSS
To: www-style@www10.w3.org
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 14:41:57 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: www-html@www10.w3.org
In-Reply-To: <199507251758.LAA00287@white.nmt.edu> from "Benjamin C. W. Sittler" at Jul 25, 95 11:58:02 am

Benjamin C. W. Sittler once wrote...
> 
> What MIME Content-type do you suggest for CSS Stylesheets? What about
> default file extensions?
> 

I would think that the browser authors could figure this one out, since
you can easily configure the servers to send whatever Content-Type you
need.

But off-hand, this seems reasonable:

text/stylesheet; version=css     (extension .css)
text/stylesheet; version=dsssl   (extension .dsssl or .dss) 
text/stylesheet; version=viola   (extension .ora or .viola)

Then the browsers need to be upgraded to recognize their own stylesheet
Content-Type.

-- 
   %%%%%% mikebat@clark.net %%%%%% http://www.clark.net/pub/mikebat/ %%%%%%