Re: No IMG in FIG

Benjamin C. W. Sittler (bsittler@prism.nmt.edu)
Fri, 14 Jul 1995 18:31:00 -0600


Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 18:31:00 -0600
Message-Id: <199507150031.SAA24038@prism.nmt.edu>
To: www-html@www10.w3.org
From: bsittler@prism.nmt.edu (Benjamin C. W. Sittler)
Subject: Re: No IMG in FIG

>On Fri, 14 Jul 1995, Benjamin C. W. Sittler wrote:
>> It would be really nice if the content model on FID were changed to allow
>> IMG's inside... 
>
>I agree.  If FIG is a peer of P, why doesn't it have the same content 
>model?
>
>	Brian
>
>--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
>brian@organic.com  brian@hyperreal.com  http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
>

FIG has a more general content model than P, actually... it includes a dummy
element whose content-model is %body.text, so it can contain <P>.

In fact... all text inside a FIG needs to be contained in <P>, <Hn>, etc.