Re: Image formats deleted from 3.0?

Eric A. Perlman (ericp@well.com)
Tue, 4 Jul 1995 10:33:19 -0700 (PDT)


Date: Tue, 4 Jul 1995 10:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Eric A. Perlman" <ericp@well.com>
Subject: Re: Image formats deleted from 3.0?
To: Bill Brooks <wbrooks@trumpet.aix.calpoly.edu>
Cc: www-html@www10.w3.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91.950704011500.137605A-100000@trumpet.aix.calpoly.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9507041034.A15080-0100000@well>

On Tue, 4 Jul 1995, Bill Brooks wrote:

> 
> HTML 1.0 specified that image formats should be one of .xbm or .gif. 
> But I can't find anything in the 3.0 standard that says whether or not 
> JPEG is a supported format. Was this intentional? Or was it just to get 
> around the whole .gif vs. .png issue? Maybe it's in some other section 
> than where I expected to find it. Help me out. 

This has nothing to do with HTML. but browsers.

All browsers can display .xbm and .gif (prefered). New ones can display 
JPEG.

-eric


+----------------+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| Eric A Perlman |             http://www.yikes.com/            | SPLAT!      |
| ericp@well.com |   http://crew.bhs.berkeley.k12.ca.us/Crew/   | /dev/null   |
+----------------+----------------------------------------------+-------------+