Re: <PAGE> proposal

Eric S. Raymond (esr@locke.ccil.org)
Sat, 23 Dec 1995 11:15:26 -0500 (EST)


From: "Eric S. Raymond" <esr@locke.ccil.org>
Message-Id: <199512231615.LAA21109@locke.ccil.org>
Subject: Re: <PAGE> proposal
To: aray@pipeline.com (Arjun Ray)
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 11:15:26 -0500 (EST)
Cc: william@cs.columbia.edu, www-html@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9512221712.A19598-0100000@alpha> from "Arjun Ray" at Dec 22, 95 06:06:56 pm

> It looks to me that the "cohesion" you're really questioning is that 
> between an URL and a document entity. i.e. that a single URL resolves, 
> and is expected to resolve, to a single entity, when for convenience you 
> want to store multiple entities together and still have that *single* URL 
> refer to this collection in an "intelligent" way.

No, in my view the worst cohesion is between "document entity", "file", and
"scrollable display extent".  One URL to one document entity doesn't bother
me much at all.
--
							>>esr>>