Re: Erm, is HTML content or presentation based?

Mike Batchelor (mikebat@clark.net)
Mon, 7 Aug 1995 15:22:50 -0400 (EDT)


From: Mike Batchelor <mikebat@clark.net>
Message-Id: <199508071922.PAA17801@clark.net>
Subject: Re: Erm, is HTML content or presentation based?
To: www-html@www10.w3.org
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 15:22:50 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199508071521.JAA07267@puce.nmt.edu> from "Benjamin C. W. Sittler" at Aug 7, 95 09:21:26 am

Benjamin C. W. Sittler once wrote...
> 
> Ignoring HTML 3 tags can certainly destroy some dicument structure. For
> example, ignoring IDs can break many hyperlinks of the #xxx variety. Also,
> ignoring containters like NOTE can cause distinct blocks of text to run
> together in undesired ways (hence the HR abuse now rampant in HTML 3
> docs... my own included.) Having browsers treat the new containers like
> <P> and recognize IDs would go a long way towards increasing the number of
> people writing HTML 3.

I should have been more concise.  Any browser can ignore HTML v3
attributes (not tags, I didn't say "tags") added to HTML v2 tags, without
altering the content.  Obviously, ignoring <note> or <fig> will change the
document.

ID may be an exception, although <p id=foo> is still a <p> if you ignore
that attribute.  Is Arena even supporting this yet?

-- 
   %%%%%% mikebat@clark.net %%%%%% http://www.clark.net/pub/mikebat/ %%%%%%