Re: FYI: User-defined logical emphasis styles

Joe English (jenglish@crl.com)
Wed, 02 Nov 1994 09:44:53 -0800


Message-Id: <199411021744.AA04164@mail.crl.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-html@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: FYI: User-defined logical emphasis styles 
In-Reply-To: <MICHAELJ.941101084203@relay.relay.com> 
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 1994 09:44:53 -0800
From: Joe English <jenglish@crl.com>


michaelj@relay.relay.com (Michael Johnson) wrote:

> Actually, this capability is already in HTML+ in the form of the <RENDER>
> tag. <RENDER> allows you to specify an arbitrary tag name (such as SLANG) and
> define the combination of styles to be applied to phrases marked with that
> tag (such as B, I, Q, TT, and so on, and P which indicates the tag should
> cause a paragraph break).

<RENDER> and user-defined elements are still controversial,
since users have to modify the DTD for it to work.  The
mechanism for doing so is not at all intuitive without a
thorough understanding of SGML, and it's a lot more work for
browsers.  (Well, not really; browsers could continue to ignore
the DTD internal subset and only pay attention to <RENDER> tags,
but that will only encourage the proliferation of illegal HTML
on the Web.)

InfoMaster/IBMIDDoc lets users define new semantic classes 
without modifying the base tag set.  This seemed like
a cleaner approach to me.



--Joe English

  jenglish@crl.com