Re: Processing instructions for style tweaks?

Glenn Adams (glenn@stonehand.com)
Wed, 14 Dec 94 11:55:54 -0500


Message-Id: <9412141655.AA01579@trubetzkoy.metis.com>
From: Glenn Adams <glenn@stonehand.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 94 11:55:54 -0500
To: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau)
Subject: Re: Processing instructions for style tweaks?
Cc: www-html@www0.cern.ch


  From: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau)
  Date: Wed, 14 Dec 94 11:44:39 EST

  I'm not belittling the need for validation, in any format, but the
  notion that *server* software should be responsible for it strikes me
  as inappropriate...

I guess by "responsible" I mean something slightly weaker; namely,
that the server be responsible for not transmitting invalid HTML
data. This doesn't mean it has to take any responsiblity for the
content, for which the onus clearly should be on the author.

Glenn