(no subject)

Patrick Stickler (patrick@voyager.gate.net)
Sun, 11 Dec 94 10:45:08 +0100

Date: Sun, 11 Dec 94 10:45:08 +0100
From: patrick@voyager.gate.net (Patrick Stickler)
Message-Id: <9412110945.AA05075@voyager.gate.net>
To: www-html@www0.cern.ch

>From patrick@voyager  Sat Dec 10 10:06:52 1994
Received: by voyager.gate.net (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA23263; Sat, 10 Dec 1994 10:06:52 +0100
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 94 10:06:52 +0100
From: patrick@voyager (Patrick Stickler)
Message-Id: <9412100906.AA23263@voyager.gate.net>
To: www-html@www0.cern.ch
Subject: Re: HTML 3.0 list DTD

 > From: michaelj@relay.relay.com (Michael Johnson)
 > I'd like to suggest some changes to the DTD for lists just to clarify things
 > a little:

It might be far too late to change, but would it be possible to redefine
(fix) the HTML lists altogether by defining a single structure <L> (list)
which may be indexed (i.e. "ordered"), bulleted, dashed, etc. and if indexed,
then with a particular type of ordinal (arabic numberal, roman numeral,
lowercase alpha, uppercase alpha, etc.). 

After all, what is an "unordered list" (<UL>)? Is the browser at liberty to
display <UL> list items in any arbitrary or random order?! And what is the
structural difference between indexed lists and bulleted lists. Nothing
other than whether their linear ordering is presented incrementally or
statically (which is formatting, not structure).

    Patrick Stickler                        Email: patrick@voyager.gate.net
    Senior Computer Systems Engineer        Phone: (407) 356-9852 Office
    Information Group                                    356-6094 Lab 1
    Martin Marietta Corporation                          356-7725 Lab 2
    MP1270, 12506 Lake Underhill Rd.                     356-5685 Lab 3
    Orlando, Florida 32825 U.S.A.           Fax:   (407) 356-8949
    Don't put off for tomorrow what you can do today; because if you enjoy
    it today, you can do it again tomorrow...