Subject: Re: More HTML3 DTD To: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:33:57 -0500 (EST) From: Murray Maloney <email@example.com> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org In-Reply-To: <MICHAELJ.email@example.com> from "Michael Johnson" at Dec 2, 94 03:18:24 pm Message-Id: <firstname.lastname@example.org.COM> Shouldn't be so hard. Each new row separator in IBM BookMaster can infer a </TR> in HTML. > > Joe English wrote: > >email@example.com (Michael Johnson) wrote: > >> Why has the TR element been made into a container? > > > >Probably to avoid the storm of protest that > >arose when <P> was changed from a separator > >into a container. > > OK, I can buy that. My concern was that translation from some other GMLs is > made more difficult by TR being a container. I'm thinking specifically of > IBM BookMaster here, which uses its table row separator element in the same > way that HTML+ does (did). > > Michael Johnson > Relay Technology, Inc.