Re: More HTML3 DTD

Murray Maloney (murray@sco.com)
Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:33:57 -0500 (EST)


Subject: Re: More HTML3 DTD
To: michaelj@relay.relay.com
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:33:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Murray Maloney <murray@sco.com>
Cc: www-html@www0.cern.ch
In-Reply-To: <MICHAELJ.941202072916@relay.relay.com> from "Michael Johnson" at Dec 2, 94 03:18:24 pm
Message-Id:  <9412020933.aa24847@dali.scocan.sco.COM>

Shouldn't be so hard.  Each new row separator in IBM BookMaster
can infer a </TR> in HTML.
> 
> Joe English wrote:
> >michaelj@relay.relay.com (Michael Johnson) wrote:
> >>                  Why has the TR element been made into a container?
> >
> >Probably to avoid the storm of protest that
> >arose when <P> was changed from a separator
> >into a container.
> 
> OK, I can buy that. My concern was that translation from some other GMLs is
> made more difficult by TR being a container. I'm thinking specifically of
> IBM BookMaster here, which uses its table row separator element in the same
> way that HTML+ does (did).
> 
> Michael Johnson
> Relay Technology, Inc.