- From: Brian M. Ames <brian.ames@ameshymn.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 23:25:27 -0400
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
The pattern given for CURIE in http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-curie-20101216 is ineffective for validation since it matches anything but an empty string. That is to say (([\i-[:]][\c-[:]]*)?:)?.+ is no different than .+ alone. An alternative would be (([\i-[:]][\c-[:]]*)?:).+|([^:])+ which would require any CURIE without a prefix but containing a colon to be prefixed with a colon delimiter. Example a:1:more:time :1:more:time 1 more time would all be valid but 1:more:time would not be. -- Best regards, Brian M. Ames http://www.ameshymn.org
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 15:20:57 UTC