W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Various issues with using CURIEs in OWL

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:06:53 +0100
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, W3C OWL Chairs <team-owl-chairs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <57AB3883-E0A5-42A9-8C6F-EDD1ABBBCBB2@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Another way of putting the concern:
    If
       * the set of CURIEs is not common (since we can subset in  
different ways), and
       * the syntax (even in XML) is not common, and
       * the processing model(s) is(are) not common
    then
       why is it better to have a recommendation than we all continue  
as we've been doing?

Esp. when consider the cost of standardization.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 11:07:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:59 GMT