Re: [XHTML 1.1 Proposed Recommendation 11 June 2008] Invalid or out of date references

Thanks for these comments.  First, I assume you are referring to XHTML 
Basic 1.1.

I have updated the XML reference to the fourth edition.

I have removed the XForms reference - it wasn't supposed to be in there 
and was not used anywhere. 

Thanks for bringing these to our attention.

Shane McCarron, on behalf of
The XHTML 2 Working Group

Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> I'm forwarding two editorial comments collected around the review of
> XHTML 1.1:
>
> Please update the normative Reference to use XML 4th edition instead of
> 3rd
>
> In informative reference, please correct "[XFORMS]
> Need real reference text here" to a real reference.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Philippe
>
>
>   

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com