W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: Comment on "CURIE Syntax 1.0" Working Draft 6 May 2008 (PR#8042)

From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:17:39 -0700
Message-ID: <E254B0A7E0268949ABFE5EA97B7D0CF4051E7669@USA7061MS01.na.xerox.net>
To: "Shane McCarron" <xhtml2-issues@mn.aptest.com>
Cc: <www-html-editor@w3.org>

Shane,

I will report to the Forms WG that you have resolved the Forms WG
comments and since you have resolved them you need not wait for any
response from Forms WG for CR.

As for my personal comment, the RNG definition is a request to consider
an RNG definition as part of your work on XHTML modularization with RNG,
so if that is not a part of your current phase of work with XHTML2 then
it should not hold up CR.  Sinec you are already considering it, I am
satisfied with your response to my comment.

Leigh L. Klotz, Jr.
Xerox Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: Shane McCarron [mailto:xhtml2-issues@mn.aptest.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 2:42 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comment on "CURIE Syntax 1.0" Working Draft 6 May 2008
(PR#8042)

Leigh,

Thanks for your comments.  The requested changes have been made with the
exception of including a RelaxNG definition.  The working group is in
the process of developing an overall strategy on supporting RelaxNG.
When that strategy is ready, we will introduce the appropriate
datatypes.

We hope this resolves your last call comments on CURIEs.  We plan to
proceed to Candidate Recommendation as soon as possible.
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2008 21:18:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:57 GMT