W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: XHTML Strict 1.1 Validation vs 1.0

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:45:48 +0100
Message-ID: <47F3D45C.9040208@googlemail.com>
To: SRJC <jsengstack@santarosa.edu>
CC: www-html-editor@w3.org

SRJC wrote:
> 
> Hi:
> 
> I teach HTML at the Santa Rosa Junior College in Santa Rosa, CA. I 
> expect all student work to pass XHTML 1.0 Strict validation. I see now 
> that XHTML 1.1 is an option. I'm not sure this is a new development or 
> if I just happened to stumble across it for the first time. I just 
> noticed it in the Tidy Firefox plug-in.
> 
> Should we change our validation to 1.1? Is there a validator for 1.1? If 
> we should be validating to 1.1, what do we need to do differently?

As http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/ explains: "This is a list to report errors 
/ send review comments on HTML/XHTML specifications. This is NOT a 
discussion list." (X)HTML authoring issues may be discussed in many 
places, including the comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html usenet group:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html/topics

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 18:46:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:57 GMT