W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > October to December 2007

TAG Comment on: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role/#sec_3.1.

From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:17:21 +0000
To: "www-html-editor@w3.org" <www-html-editor@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9674EA156DA93A4F855379AABDA4A5C604F35B89B0@G5W0277.americas.hpqcorp.net>

Dear XHTML Editors,

Please can you clarify your intentions with respect to the use of CURIE's. In particular the TAG would like to understand whether the intention is that CURIE's be useable in existing elements/attribute where URIReferences are places are already in use, or only in new(?) elements and attributes where use of CURIEs is specifically called out.

The TAG is particularly concerned about how existing processors are expected to behave in the presense of markup containing CURIEs if they are to be used in places where existing processors URIReferences.

Many thanks,

Stuart Williams
on behalf of W3C TAG
--
Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Monday, 12 November 2007 12:18:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:56 GMT